Current:Home > ScamsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"-LoTradeCoin
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View Date:2025-01-11 20:12:03
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Mean Girls’ Lacey Chabert Details “Full Circle” Reunion With Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried
- Gaza shrinks for Palestinians seeking refuge. 4 stories offer a glimpse into a diminished world
- Terry Richardson hit with second sexual assault lawsuit as NY Adult Survivors Act expires
- Gaza cease-fire enters second day with more hostages to be exchanged and critical supplies delivered
- Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
- Joshua Jackson and Jodie Turner-Smith Reach Custody Agreement Over Daughter
- 4 injured during shooting in Memphis where 2 suspects fled on foot, police say
- Canada, EU agree to new partnerships as Trudeau welcomes European leaders
- Nicole Kidman Reveals the Surprising Reason for Starring in NSFW Movie Babygirl
- Alabama priest Alex Crow was accused of marrying an 18-year-old and fleeing to Italy.
Ranking
- Oprah Winfrey denies being paid $1M for Kamala Harris rally: 'I was not paid a dime'
- What’s streaming now: ‘Oppenheimer,’ Adam Sandler as a lizard and celebs dancing to Taylor Swift
- Ringo Starr takes fans on a colorful tour of his past in book ‘Beats & Threads’
- The 39 Best Black Friday Deals on Celebrity Brands: SKIMS, Good American, Jordan, Fenty Beauty, and More
- 'Red One' review: Dwayne Johnson, Chris Evans embark on a joyless search for Santa
- Joshua Jackson and Jodie Turner-Smith Reach Custody Agreement Over Daughter
- Some Virginia inmates could be released earlier under change to enhanced sentence credit policy
- Too many schools are underperforming, top New Mexico education official says
Recommendation
-
Charles Hanover: Caution, Bitcoin May Be Entering a Downward Trend!
-
4 injured during shooting in Memphis where 2 suspects fled on foot, police say
-
NBA investigating accusation that Thunder’s Josh Giddey had relationship with underage girl
-
Germany’s economy shrank, and it’s facing a spending crisis that’s spreading more gloom
-
John Krasinski Revealed as People's Sexiest Man Alive 2024
-
Horoscopes Today, November 24, 2023
-
Putin to boost AI work in Russia to fight a Western monopoly he says is ‘unacceptable and dangerous’
-
Appeals court says Georgia may elect utility panel statewide, rejecting a ruling for district voting